Use the verified source-page figures as a shortlist, then confirm product, pack and operating conditions through a representative trial.
The table below reproduces only figures visible in the current first-party model pages. Approximate, typical and product-dependent wording is retained. These figures are useful for shortlisting, not unconditional performance guarantees; final suitability should be confirmed with representative product, the real pack and an agreed test method.
| Machine page | Published range | Published speed | Published accuracy | Other source-page information |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weigh Filling Machine 100 | Approximately 5–100 g, application-dependent | Up to approximately 10 packs/min | Approximately ±0.5–3 g, typical | Compact stainless hopper; micro-computer control; vibratory feed; 110/220 V, 50–60 Hz; approximately 300 W typical |
| Weigh Filling Machine 500 | Approximately 5–500 g | Approximately 5–10 packs/min | Approximately ±2–6 g, typical | Model 500LU; micro-computer and electric eye; stainless hopper; 110/220 V, 50–60 Hz; approximately 300 W |
| Weigh Filling Machine 1000 | 20–1000 g | Approximately 6–12 bags/min | Approximately ±5 g, product-dependent | Model 1000LU; interchangeable large/small outlet; 220 V/50 Hz or 110 V/60 Hz; approximately 480 W; source page lists machine size and weight |
| Twin Head Weigh Depositor 5000 | 100–10000 g | 20–30 bags/min, typical | 2–6 g, typical | Two 25 L hoppers; both lanes and the downstream receiving cycle should be assessed |
| Weigh Depositor 10000 | No numeric model specification is stated in the current supplied page | Confirm product flow, target dose, pack support, outlet arrangement and throughput through the current quotation and trial process | ||
A nominal range does not prove that one outlet, hopper and feeder setup will cover every product and target. Particle size, bulk density, flow, pack opening and product cut-off can narrow the practical window.
Specify whether speed means dosing cycles, finished good packs or combined twin-lane output. Include operator handling, pack presentation, refill and downstream waiting so quotations can be compared on the same basis.
Record the target, tolerance, sample size, measurement equipment, order of results, product batch and settings. Do not compare one supplier's typical figure with another supplier's sustained pack data without matching the conditions.
Provide the full target range and the products used at each end. A machine that can reach both weights nominally may still need different outlets, settings or product handling.
Send the largest piece or particle and the actual pouch, jar or bag opening. A suitable weighing range does not solve a blocked outlet or an unsupported pack.
Manual handling, foot-pedal operation, sensor control and automatic bagger integration create different practical cycle times and safety considerations. State the intended operating method.
A twin-head route may increase combined output or serve coordinated discharges, but the packer or operator must receive them. Define lane independence, fault behaviour and downstream capacity.
List the products, recipes, allergens or contamination controls and pack sizes. Cleaning access and change parts may affect the better commercial choice more than a small difference in headline output.
Record ordered weights, mean, minimum, maximum, giveaway, product damage, cycle time, refill behaviour, stops, pack presentation and cleaning observations under the agreed conditions.
A compact linear weigh filler may be suitable for straightforward free-flowing products, while high-output combination weighing, fine powder auger filling, VFFS bagging or pre-made pouch handling may require a different machine family. The model comparison is therefore one part of the complete selection process.
Include product samples or data, target weights, tolerance, pack opening, required output, operating method, available space and any upstream or downstream equipment.
Request a model comparison